Fifth Circuit· 8/9/2012
Lawrence Kenemore, Jr. v. Keith Roy
Citations
- 690 F.3d 639
- 2012 WL 3217962
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16635
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a claim brought via the savings clause must be “based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision”
- “A GVR does not bind the lower court to which the case is remanded; that court is free to determine whether its original decision is still correct in light of the changed circumstances or whether a different result is more appropriate.”
- \A GVR does not bind the lower court to which the case is remanded; that court is free to determine whether its original decision is still correct in light of the changed circumstances or whether a different result is more appropriate.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clement, Reavley, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationSixth Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 325×
- Arturo Diaz v. William Stephens, DirectorFifth Circuit· 2013-09-25· cited 67×
- United States v. Raymond Surratt, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2015-07-31· cited 25×
- Tiofila Santillana v. Jody Upton, WardenFifth Circuit· 2017-01-16· cited 25×
- State of Louisiana v. Rogers LacazeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2018-03-13· cited 13×
- State v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2016-09-07· cited 8×
- Tavares J. Wright v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-09-27· cited 7×
- Tavares J. Wright v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2018-11-01
- Randy Cole v. Michael HunterFifth Circuit· 2019-08-21
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
- Jose Evaristo Reyes-Requena v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2001-02-28· cited 948×
- Tyler v. CainSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 822×
- Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. HuttingerFifth Circuit· 1990-04-27· cited 315×
- Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court· 1981-11-09· cited 282×
- Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. ChaterSupreme Court· 1996-01-08· cited 158×
- Douglas L. Cox v. Warden, Federal Detention Center, Etc.Federal Circuit· 1990-09-17· cited 150×
- Henry v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court· 1964-04-06· cited 80×
- Nathaniel West v. Donald Vaughn, Superintendent of Sci Graterford the District Attorney of County of Phila. The Attorney General of the State of PaThird Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 39×
- Mariscal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-19· cited 27×
- Henry v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court· 1963-10-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.