· 6/21/2005
Lawrence E. Woznick v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 19 Vet. App. 198
- 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 410
- 2005 WL 1432287
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that speculation that a claimant may not successfully obtain relief is not an adequate basis for refusing to comply with the adjudicatory process
- directing the Secretary to issue an SOC in response to the claimant’s NOD
- granting petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus
- directing the Secretary to issue an SOC as to the appellant’s claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kasold, Moorman, Per Curiam, Schoelen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.