Skip to main content
· 6/21/2005

Lawrence E. Woznick v. R. James Nicholson

Citations

  • 19 Vet. App. 198
  • 2005 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 410
  • 2005 WL 1432287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that speculation that a claimant may not successfully obtain relief is not an adequate basis for refusing to comply with the adjudicatory process
  • directing the Secretary to issue an SOC in response to the claimant’s NOD
  • granting petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus
  • directing the Secretary to issue an SOC as to the appellant’s claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kasold, Moorman, Per Curiam, Schoelen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.