Lawrence C. Bieneman v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “regulation” is preempted but allowing limited claims for damages
• aligning the limitations period for claims brought directly under the Constitution with the limitations period for § 1983 claims
• overruling Luedtke to the extent it holds that damages are preempted, but distinguishing damages from “regulation”
• allowing common law remedies for “operations that offend federal law, or that federal norms do not govern”
• finding conflict among class members in airport-noise case because increased operations at airport “make the area attractive for business and may increase the value of land, even as they make land less attractive for residential purposes.”
• referring to the savings clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).