Lawrence Bowlds, Jr. v. General Motors Manufacturing Division of the General Motors Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that while courts should construe certain veterans’ statutes liberally, 13|| they are not permitted to create rights out of whole cloth
• finding that USERRA did not apply retroactively to claims that arose in the 1980’s, and analyzing those claims under the VRRA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).