Lawrence A. Wajda v. United States of America, Lawrence A. Wajda v. U.S. Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal courts retain jurisdiction to determine whether the United States Parole Commission exceeded its statutory authority or violated the Constitution notwithstanding the federal courts’ lack of jurisdiction to review substantive decisions
• “[C]ounsel’s performance is not deficient by failing to predict future developments in the law.”
• \[C]ounsel's performance is not deficient by failing to predict future developments in the law.\
• counsel not ineffective for failing to predict future developments in law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).