Lawless v. Sasnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hazard was knee-deep hole obscured by grass that had grown to the height of approximately one foot
• hazard was knee-deep hole obscured by grass that had grown to the height of approximately one foot
• whether defendant had constructive knowledge of knee-deep hole hidden by foot-high grass was question for jury
• summary judgment improper where knee-deep hole was obscured by grass 12 inches high creating a jury issue as to whether owner liable due to size of hole and infrequent maintenance
• jury question where the size of the hole and tall grass could be inferred by a jury as a failure to exercise reasonable care in inspecting the premises

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).