Lawler v. Merritt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff could not establish a hazardous condition on the basis of a burnt-out streetlight merely because the affected roadway “is large and at. times busy — -a condition which exists at many city intersections”
• determining that city owed no duty to pedestrian struck while crossing at a place where nearest streetlight was burned out

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).