Skip to main content
· 10/9/2007

Lawler v. Kulik (In Re Kulik)

Citations

  • 400 B.R. 313
  • 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 611
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4203
  • 2007 WL 4322442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “…State Court was without in personam jurisdiction over the Debtor when it entered the Judgment Order and the Judgment Order has no preclusive effect.”
  • state court was without in personam jurisdiction over the debtor when it entered the judgment, so the judgment had no preclusive effect and could not be enforced against the debtor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arthur B. Briskman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.