Skip to main content
· 5/17/1990

Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture

Citations

  • 793 S.W.2d 27
  • 1990 Tex. App. LEXIS 1655
  • 1990 WL 94105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that for example, the partnership act provides for joint and several liability
  • fact that insurance policy did not name all members of joint venture did not create a material factual issue as to plaintiff's employment
  • where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title
  • where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title
  • where proposed amendment authorizing a lottery and bingo was silent as to checks and balances of other branches of government, and Supreme Court interpreted proposed amendment as prohibiting such checks and balances, that fact must be disclosed in ballot title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whitham, Rowe, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.