Lawler v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that ALJ was entitled to resolve conflicting medical opinions by adopting one over the other
• “But the question of what a claimant can do despite his limitations is exclusively within the ALJ's purview . . . Thus, an examining physician need not provide a function-by-function analysis.”
• “Although an ALJ is not required to discuss every piece of evidence, he must consider all of the evidence that is relevant to the disability determination and provide enough analysis in his decision to permit meaningful judicial review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).