Lawing v. Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t was error to entertain [a] collateral attack on an unrelated judgment not void on its face[.]”
• “[I]t was error to entertain [a] collateral attack on an unrelated judgment not void on its face[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).