Lawes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding provisions contained in a disjunctive list were not so essentially and inseparably connected with each other
• declaring Minnesota stalking by mail statute unconstitutional because it did not include elements requiring proof of a specific criminal intent or substantial harm to the victim
• curing unconstitutional overbreadth by striking “disturb” and “cause distress” from a statute prohibiting someone from repeatedly mailing something “with the intent to abuse, disturb, or cause distress”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).