Law v. Zemp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Baybank, 141 NH 780 (finding that draft- ers of RULPA charging provision intended that reference be made to the UPA provision for means of enforcing the cred- itor’s rights in the charged partnership interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Law v. Zemp
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-01-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Coverstone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-01-29· cited 115×
• Law ex rel. Robert M. Law Profit Sharing Plan v. Zemp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-05-02· cited 3×

Other cases named Law v. Zemp

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Law v. Zemp
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-01-11
• Law v. Zemp
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-01-11