· 1/23/1998
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
Citations
- 134 F.3d 1438
- 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1278
- 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 621
- 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 942
- 1998 WL 23713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that courts may employ sanctions in the civil contempt context “for either or both of two purposes: to coerce the [party charged with contempt] into compliance with the court’s order, and to compensate the [other party] for losses sustained” (citation omitted)
- finding a sanction that included a twenty-five percent surcharge above plaintiffs’ actual costs to be a criminal contempt sanction because it was neither compensatory nor avoidable by complying with the court’s order
- “When the primary purpose of a contempt motion is to seek compliance with a court order, the proceeding is remedial in nature and is, therefore, a civil contempt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Logan, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.