Skip to main content
· 1/23/1998

Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

Citations

  • 134 F.3d 1438
  • 39 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1278
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 621
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 942
  • 1998 WL 23713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that courts may employ sanctions in the civil contempt context “for either or both of two purposes: to coerce the [party charged with contempt] into compliance with the court’s order, and to compensate the [other party] for losses sustained” (citation omitted)
  • finding a sanction that included a twenty-five percent surcharge above plaintiffs’ actual costs to be a criminal contempt sanction because it was neither compensatory nor avoidable by complying with the court’s order
  • “When the primary purpose of a contempt motion is to seek compliance with a court order, the proceeding is remedial in nature and is, therefore, a civil contempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Logan, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.