Law v. Garden State Tanning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to employment discrimination claims under both the ADA and PHRA
• concluding that employer’s decision was reasonable, in part, because of plaintiff’s 29-year history of addiction
• holding that the McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to employment discrimination claims under the ADA
• holding that the McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to employment discrimination claims under the ADA
• holding that the McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to employment discrimination claims under the ADA
• holding McDonnell Douglas analysis applies to employment discrimination claims under ADA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).