Law v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the dispute between Mahler and State Farm was not a coverage dispute, but rather a dispute about the value of the right to reimbursement
• providing that consent to counsel by the benefited party is not required in common-fund cases because the proper focus is on the benefited party
• awarding costs and fees under MAR 7.3 for appeal and remanding to trial court for calculation under RAP 18.1(i)
• awarding costs and fees under MAR 7.3 for appeal and remanding to trial court for calculation under RAP 18.1(i)
• suggesting use of lodestar method to calculate fee award pursuant to MAR 7.3
• suggesting use of lodestar method to calculate fee award pursuant to MAR 7.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).