· 10/7/1996
Law Practice of J. B. Grossman, P. A. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Citations
- 519 U.S. 809
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding AT & T violated section 2 of Sherman Act by refusing to connect MCI to its network, an essential facility
- rejecting defendants’ suggestion that a 26-day time limit in an antitrust case was too short and that the limit should have been computed in months, not days
- deliberately bringing administrative actions with the knowledge that the agencies involved lacked the authority to take the desired action constitutes sham activity
- plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist
- plaintiff must show control of the essential facility by a monopolist
- judgment was remanded for a new trial and damages
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.