· 8/30/2002
Law Offices of Curtis v. Trinko, L.L.P., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Bell Atlantic Corporation
Citations
- 305 F.3d 89
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that once an interconnectivity agreement is formed and approved by government regulators, “the [C]ommunica-tions Act intends that the [local exchange carrier] be governed directly by the specific agreement rather than the general duties described in ... section 251.”
- discussing AT & T's fight to become a CLEC in Verizon's territory
- \The savings clause unambiguously establishes that there is no `plain repugnancy' between the Telecommunications Act and the antitrust statutes\
- “The savings clause unambiguously establishes that there is no ‘plain repugnancy’ between the Telecommunications Act and the antitrust statutes [and thus ] that the Telecommunications Act does not provide an ‘implicit immunity’ from the antitrust laws.”
- permitting antitrust claims to proceed by applying general antitrust principles
- permitting antitrust claims to proceed by applying general antitrust principles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sack, Katzmann, Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.