Law Offices of Christopher S. Lucas & Associates v. Disciplinary Board of Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e hold that the Disciplinary Board is not a ‘person’ who can be sued within the meaning of § 1983.”
• “[W]e hold that the Eleventh Amendment is a bar to Plaintiff’s suit against the Disciplinary Board.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).