Law Office of Josh Brown, L.L.C. v. Ohio Secretary of State
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 819
Syllabus
On Respondent's objections to a Report and Recommendation, the Court overruled the objections and adopted the Report and Recommendation. The Court ordered Respondent to produce all emails responsive to Requester's first public records request. The Court determined that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by the Requester, excepting attorney fees.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \[r]es judicata precludes the assertion of a claim after a judgment on the merits in a prior suit by parties or their privies based on the same cause of action\
- stating that res judicata “ ‘prevents litigation of all grounds for, or defenses to, recovery that were previously available to the parties, regardless of whether they were asserted or determined in the prior proceeding ’ ”
- stating that the “party invoking res judicata must establish” the elements
- providing that “res judicata does not bar claims that do not exist at the time of the prior litigation” and finding that a claim did not exist at the time of a previous suit and was therefore not barred
- explaining the same elements for res judicata claim preclusion under the Fourth Circuit’s approach
- “Res judicata does not bar claims that did not exist at the time of the prior litigation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sadler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.