Law Office of Brattain v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating “a notice of dis-allowance must be ‘clear and unequivocal’ if it is to initiate the sixty-day period after which claims are barred” (citation omitted)
• rejecting inquiry notice as substitute for statutory notice requirement in probate proceedings
• rejecting argument that inquiry notice sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).