Lauro v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “voice and sound recordings of an individual are interests that are protected by the Fourth Amendment under current case law”
• “Apparently conceding this point, plaintiff does not even argue in either his memoranda of law that his ... claim should survive summary judgment.”
• even if an officer fails to accurately identify an offense, an arrest is lawful if probable cause existed to arrest the suspect for a crime for which warrantless arrests are permitted
• even if an officer fails to accurately identify an offense, an arrest is lawful if probable cause existed to arrest the suspect for a crime for which warrantless arrests are permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).