Lauro ACEVES, Jamie Aceves, Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Ninth Circuit is bound to follow the holdings of the California Supreme Court when applying California law
• holding that “federal law should control the reimbursement of expert witnesses in federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction”
• holding that the Ninth Cir- cuit is bound to follow the California Supreme Court’s inter- pretation of California law
• ruling that the federal rule governing costs controls when a state-law costs 23 statute directly conflicts with the federal law
• holding that the Ninth Circuit is bound by the Califor- nia Supreme Court’s interpretation of California law
• holding that the insurer could maintain a statute of limitations defense to a claim even after initially confirming coverage and failing to state that the claim might be time-barred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).