Laurito v. Public School Employes' Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Salary adjustment received by retiree in the year he retired was a severance payment that was not includable as compensation for retirement purposes.
• Salary adjustment received by retiree in the year he retired was a severance payment that was not includable as compensation for retirement purposes.
• $16,000 salary adjustment for employee’s devoted service was severance payment rather than compensation since it was not established that it was customary for an individual of similar experience within the school district to receive a similar adjustment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).