Laurin Tankers America, Inc. v. Stolt Tankers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “in proper circumstances, a reviewing court may look beyond ‘the face of the award’ to ‘the arbitration proceeding’ to ‘do equity and justice’”
• “arbitrators’ error in transforming an undisputed sea passage [fuel] consumption amount into a daily [fuel] consumption amount may be regarded as clerical,” warranting award’s modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).