Laurence Burgin v. Crispus Nix, Warden, Isp John Henry, Head of Security, Isp and John Sanders, No. 220, Unit Manager, Isp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no constitutional right for inmates to receive a “non-sacked” meal versus a “sacked” meal when both meal offerings were determined to be nutritionally adequate
• inmates do not have a constitutional right to be served any particular type of food
• “One constitutional protection retained by the prisoner is the right to an adequate diet”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).