Lauren M. Pavlovich v. National City Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the debate as to whether aiding and abetting fraud is a valid claim in Ohio
• noting [e]conomic losses include not only diminution in value and consequential losses like lost profits, but also .. . the loss of electronic funds and failed investments.”
• \It is unclear whether Ohio recognizes a common law cause of action for aiding and abetting tortious conduct.\
• “It is unclear whether Ohio recognizes a common law cause of action for aiding and abetting tortious conduct.”
• “Under Ohio law, contract interpretation is a matter of law when a contract’s terms are clear and unambiguous.”
• “To establish a breach of contract, a plaintiff must show that a contract existed, the plaintiff performed, the defendant breached, and the plaintiff suffered damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).