Laurelli v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant did not waive application of MICRA because it failed to 14 raise MICRA in its answer or any other time before the entering of judgment
• observing that whether waiver of an issue has occurred “is a question of federal law under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
• finding that plaintiff’s injury caused by ventilator 7 becoming disconnected constituted professional negligence under MICRA
• “Whether § 3333.2 limits noneconomic damages recoverable by Taylor is a question 14 of law, which this Court reviews de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).