Laurel Capital Group, Inc. v. BT Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “ ‘Laurel,’ used as the dominant portion of both parties mark, bears no logical or suggestive relationship to the actual characteristics of banking services,” rendering it an arbitrary mark

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).