Skip to main content
· 5/23/1996

Laurant v. State

Citations

  • 926 S.W.2d 782
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 2141
  • 1996 WL 277026

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding defendant did not timely obtain ruling on motion to suppress until after evidence admitted and failed to preserve error for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mirabel, Cohen, Andell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.