· 9/22/1999
Laurance A. Tewksbury v. Ottaway Newspapers
Citations
- 192 F.3d 322
- 9 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1345
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22969
- 80 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the ADA subjects ADA claims to the same administrative exhaustion requirement as Title VII claims
- holding that an “ADA charge is subject to the time limitations set forth in Section 706(e)(1),” which details Title VII’s exhaustion and timeliness requirements
- finding EEOC and NYSDHR charges filed at same time triggered 300-day statute of limitations
- “New York is a deferral state under the ADEA because it has a law prohibiting age discrimination and the [New York State Division of Human Rights] is empowered to remedy it”
- “The [state agency] has authority to remedy employment discrimination, rendering [the state] a so-called deferral state under Section 706(e)(1),” and therefore describing the state agency responsible for enforcement of the state employment discrimination laws as “a deferral-state agency”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Winter, Walker, Cabranes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.