District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/25/1982
Lauramore v. State
Citations
- 422 So. 2d 896
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in-court identification allowed because suggestive pretrial parole revocation hearing was not so suggestive as to create a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Joanos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GuerraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-04· cited 10×
- State v. WalkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-13· cited 3×
- J.L.K. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-20· cited 1×
- State v. GreenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-22
- Kimble v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-05
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-11-13· cited 97×
- State v. SepulvadoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-08-02· cited 19×
- Dowdell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-06-16· cited 8×
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-05· cited 8×
- M. J. S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.