Laura Saukstelis v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that residual form of substantive due process may be a misnomer for rights expressly established by Constitution
• describing an earlier iteration of the City's ordinances as a \form of pre-trial attachment\
• “Courts bend over backward to explain why even the strangest rules are not that far gone.”
• “Courts bend over backward to explain why even the strangest rules are not that far gone.”
• “cascade of notices” mailed to the registered owner of the car at the address in the state’s files, “is quite sufficient under the due process clause”
• “The interest at stake is a $90 fine for a traffic infraction, and the Supreme Court has never held that a property interest so modest is a fundamental right.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).