Laura Nicola v. Michael J. Astrue, 1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that erroneously finding an impairment to be non-severe is not harmless error, even where the applicant prevailed at step two based on other impairments
• holding that erroneously finding an impairment to be non-severe is not harmless error, even where the applicant prevailed at Step Two on other grounds
• holding that erroneously finding an impairment to be non-severe is not harmless error, even where the applicant prevailed at Step Two on other grounds
• holding that the ALJ’s failure to find mental impairment severe required remand
• finding that an ALJ’s failure at step two to assess a severe mental impairment of borderline intellectual functioning required remand
• remanding because the ALJ did not include borderline intellectual functioning as a severe impairment at step two of the sequential analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).