Laura H. v. Laura H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that despite case law addressing compliance with the Code, \this issue's recurrence indicates both (1) a need still exists for guidance in this 12 area and (2) the likeliness of future recurrence in other mental-health cases\
• explaining the frequent recurrence of an issue demonstrates both that further authoritative guidance is needed and the issue is likely to recur
• lack of compliance with section 2—102(a—5) rendered the trial court’s order against the manifest weight of the evidence
• because a stack of papers in the common-law record regarding the medications was not admitted into evidence at the hearing, those papers could not support the involuntary-treatment order
• review of whether there has been compliance with section 2-102(a-5) is de novo
• review of whether there has been compliance with section 2-102(a-5) is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).