Laura A. Makowski v. Smithamundsen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “[t]he plaintiff’s manager was involved in the decisionmaking process affecting the employment action … her statement [was] an admission under Rule 801(d)(2)(D)” and thus admissible at summary judgment
• holding that because “[t]he plaintiff’s manager was involved in the decisionmaking process affecting the employment action ... her statement [was] an admission under Rule 801(d)(2)(D)” and thus admissible at summary judgment
• reversing district court’s grant of summary judgment on pregnancy discrimination claim, finding those “statements alone [were] direct evidence of a discriminatory intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).