Laughton v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inapplicable because the plaintiff was the company seeking reimbursement under corporation reimbursement section of its policy
• “The same principles apply where [the insured seeks] to estop the insurer from rescinding a policy because of the fraud of the insured on the ground that the insurer had knowledge of the facts and took no action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).