Laughlin v. School District No. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is elementary that the authority for an agency’s administrative acts must be found in an enabling statute”
• finding that because the court was reviewing a “complaint hearing” designed to meet the requirements of section 1412(6) and 45 C.F.R. 121a. 602(1972

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Megan C. v. Independent School District No. 625
  D. Minnesota· 1999-03-29· cited 12×
• 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-05-01· cited 10×
• Mrs. W. v. Tirozzi
  D. Connecticut· 1989-02-07· cited 6×
• Lucht v. Molalla River School District
  D. Oregon· 1999-06-25· cited 3×
• Laughlin v. School District No. 1
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-10· cited 3×
• Mary Hoeft v. Tucson Unified School District
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-17

Other cases named Laughlin v. School District No. 1

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Laughlin v. School District No. 1
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1984-10-10· cited 3×