Laughlin v. Lumbert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proceeds from sale of property held by special master and set aside for the debtor's homestead exemption were not subject to garnishment
• holding that proceeds from sale of property held by special master and set aside for the debtor’s homestead exemption were not subject to garnishment
• concluding that “when the court has determined to whom the money in the possession of the court’s officer should be delivered, whereupon he becomes responsible to that person rather than to the court, the same is subject to garnishment”
• concluding that “when the court has determined to whom the money in the possession of the court’s officer should be delivered, whereupon he becomes responsible to that person rather than to the court, the same is subject to garnishment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).