Skip to main content
· 12/4/1998

Laughlin v. Bergman

Citations

  • 962 S.W.2d 64
  • 1997 WL 678154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court abused its discretion by denying plaintiff a continuance to depose plaintiffs former attorney and review his files in legal-malpractice case before ruling on attorney’s summary-judgment motion when the discovery sought was “absolutely critical” to plaintiffs case
  • trial court abused its discretion by denying plaintiff a continuance to depose plaintiff’s former attorney and review his files in legal-malpractice case before ruling on attorney’s summary-judgment motion when the discovery sought was ―absolutely critical‖ to plaintiff’s case
  • plaintiffs scheduling deposition of defendant showed due diligence
  • plaintiff's scheduling deposition of defendant showed due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nuchia, Mirabal, O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.