Laufer v. Westminster Brokers, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that extrinsic fraud “may justify non-enforcement of an otherwise valid judgment”
• stating, in the context of a defense to an enforcement action, that \the only type of fraud that may justify non-enforcement of an otherwise valid judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction ... is extrinsic fraud\
• stating, in the context of a defense to an enforcement action, that “the only type of fraud that may justify non-enforcement of an otherwise valid judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction . . . is extrinsic fraud”
• res judicata applies to claims involving alleged “fraud in the matter on which the decree was rendered” (emphasis omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).