Skip to main content
· 7/11/1894

Lauer ex rel. Woltjen v. Ketner

Citations

  • 162 Pa. 265
  • 29 A. 908
  • 1894 Pa. LEXIS 973

Syllabus

<p>Married women — Judgment—Sci. fa. to revive — Coverture—Presumption.</p> <p>On a sci. fa. to revive a judgment, no defence can be made except one that has arisen since the judgment. If a judgment has been entered against husband and wife and revived without any indication of the relationship of the defendants, when it is again revived against them as husband and wife, the presumption is that the coverture took place after the first revival; and coverture cannot be pleaded or proved on a sci. fa. to revive the last judgment.</p> <p>Conlyn v. Parker, 113 Pa. 29, affirmed; Seymour v. Hubert, 92 Pa. 499, explained and distinguished.</p>

Judges: Fell, Green, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.