Skip to main content
· 11/29/1962

Lauderbaugh v. Williams

Citations

  • 409 Pa. 351
  • 186 A.2d 39
  • 1962 Pa. LEXIS 453

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that restrictive covenants are “not favored in the law” because they restrain the right to freely alienate one’s land
  • noting that right of alienation preconditioned upon admittance to local association was “not limited in time and purports to be a perpetual one, a fact which militates strongly against its enforcement”
  • restriction only permitting transfers to members of association is invalid where three members could reject applicant
  • where the court held that Plaintiffs were not on constructive notice of injury following the onset of mold-related symptoms “given the disputed and somewhat complex factual scenario”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.