Lau v. S&M Enterprises

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the requirements of borrowed-servant rule were not met as a matter of law when, inter alia, there was evidence that the general master retained control over its employee’s performance and that only the general master had the right to discharge the employee
• finding that the requirements of borrowed-servant rule were not met as a matter of law when, inter alia, there was evidence that the general master retained control over its employee’s performance and that only the general master had the right to discharge the employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).