Skip to main content
· 8/24/2006

Lattisaw v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 905 A.2d 790
  • 25 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 116
  • 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 495
  • 2006 WL 2434947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating MPD as District agency for purposes of requirement that administrative claim must be presented to “appropriate District agency”
  • describing Lattisaw’s Superior Court complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrell, Associate Judge, and Terry and Schwelb, Senior Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.