Skip to main content
· 1/15/1861

Latta v. Dodd

Citations

  • 23 Ark. 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an agency’s “failure to respond to a prepayment request” could support a claim accrual
  • “Consistent with the objective theory of contract enforcement, the undisclosed subjective intent of the parties thus place no role in this analysis, as Tamerlane definitively holds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bro, Clause, Compton, Connection, Construing, English, Error, Frankly, Hanly, Hicks, Into, Maness, Others, Statute

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.