Latson v. Sessions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel declining to cross examine a witness was reasonable
• reaffirming long-standing rule of dismissing allegations that “are contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”
• reaffirming long-standing rule of dismissing allegations that are “contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”
• reaffirming long-standing rule of dismissing allegations that “are contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”
• reaffirming long-standing rule of dismissing allegations that “are contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”
• reaffirming long-standing rule of dismissing allegations that are “contradicted by the record, inherently incredible, or conclusions rather than statements of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).