Latite Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an order that denied intervention and set aside the biological mother's consent to adoption was a final order
• holding that an order denying a motion to intervene in pending litigation is a final, appealable order because it completely disposes of the case as to the party seeking intervention
• holding that, in deference to parent’s “constitutional right to the care, custody, and control of their children,” a trial court may not compare the selected prospective adoptive parents with other placements the court or Department might otherwise choose
• holding, although the dependency court’s determinations were preeminent to another division’s orders as to adoption, the adoption agency was not precluded from bringing an adoption and termination of parental rights petition at the same time in a different division
• holding, although the dependency court’s determinations were preeminent to another division’s orders as to adoption, the adoption agency was not precluded from bringing an adoption and termination of parental rights petition at the same time in a different division
• noting § 63.082(6)(d) is “explicit recognition of the parents’ constitutional right to the care, custody, and control of their children” (citing In re C.W.W., 788 So.2d 1020, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).