Latinos Unidos De Chelsea en Accion (Lucha) v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “under the statute itself, plaintiffs must make a showing of 41 discriminatory intent; under the regulations, plaintiffs simply must show a discriminatory impact”
• concluding, as to a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 5309 by individuals who were allegedly discriminated against, that Title I of HCDA was not “enacted for their ‘especial benefit’ in the sense required for finding a private right of action”
• because “there is no private right of action,” it is “unnecessary for us to consider whether sovereign immunity stands as a bar to plaintiffs’ suit”
• civil rights action filed against city and HUD officials, alleging defendants deprived city's minority population of equal opportunities in employment, housing, and government contracts via federally funded programs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).