Skip to main content
· 5/4/1935

Lathrop v. Hall

Citations

  • 141 Kan. 909
  • 44 P.2d 201
  • 1935 Kan. LEXIS 268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “in the case at bar, while the two volitional acts of sexual penetration constituted distinct offenses, they were part of the same transaction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Action, Harvey, Hutchison, Ruling, Second

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.